The judicial murder of Mary E. Surratt examines the trial and execution of a woman accused in the assassination of a president, offering a critical perspective on the fairness of her prosecution. The narrative opens amid national turmoil, as officials scramble to identify and punish conspirators, with prominent figures driving an urgent investigation. Against this backdrop, the accused becomes emblematic of a justice system influenced by fear, revenge, and political pressure. The account portrays a complex woman caught in the intersection of loyalty, suspicion, and power, while raising questions about evidence, procedure, and the legitimacy of military tribunals. Through detailed analysis of the proceedings and the atmosphere surrounding them, the work challenges the reader to consider the boundaries between justice and retribution. The story s beginning immerses the audience in the tense, chaotic aftermath of national tragedy, setting the tone for an exploration of legal and moral dilemmas that persist throughout the narrative. Ultimately, the book frames the execution not as lawful punishment but as a miscarriage of justice emblematic of a troubled era.