Secrecy isn't always a wall. Sometimes it's a workflow.Casey Park builds integrations for Aperture Metrics, a vendor that sells "workflow optimization" to institutions that want fewer surprises. The pitch is soothing: automate intake, standardize language, route sensitive requests, reduce risk. Then a new client ticket lands in his queue-Halden University, Special Projects-with a requirement that doesn't sound like efficiency. It sounds like continuity.Halden wants accession records created before anything is physically received, sensitivity tags applied the instant a phrase appears, and all inquiries routed through counsel. It's clean, fast, and defensible-until Casey notices what makes it truly powerful: a hidden control plane that rotates tokens, narrows audit detail, and "sanitizes" logs so later reconstruction becomes impossible. No names. Only units. Only service accounts. Only outcomes.Across campus, compliance lead Elena Brooks sees the same anomaly from the other side: records arriving fully formed, provenance hardened into metadata before any intake ledger can contradict it. When she pushes for a custodian-someone who will sign for the system's authority-she's offered committees, summaries, and "appropriate channels" instead.As pressure stays calm and professional, Casey and Elena learn the design principle nobody will say out loud: when nobody owns an action, the action becomes durable. And the only way to break a continuity engine is to force a name back into the chain-before the system makes the truth unrecoverable.